Thursday, May 26, 2005



Visit ThisIsMyStore.com for all your shopping and travel needs.
Shop ThisIsMyIpodStore.com for all your Ipod and mp3 related needs.


"Liberal Media" is a myth

"Liberal Media" is a myth

May 26, 2005

By Richard Kuper

The Op Ed Page

http://theopedpage.blogspot.com

It's time, once and for all, to end the fallacious term "Liberal Media" when describing the US Press.

If the US Press was truly a "Liberal Media" then:

1. The story about the Downing Street Memo would have been a PAGE 1 story in every leading Newspaper. It would have been the LEAD STORY on every major broadcast station. It would be the number one topic on every talk radio program. And the majority of talk radio would be "Liberal." Clearly none of this has yet occurred, and the story was reported on PAGE 1 in the British Newspapers on May 1, 2005.

2. The many impeachable offenses by the President, Vice President, and others in the administration would be headline news. Not one headline is about any of them. Not one lead story on the evening news is about them. Not even Woodward or Bernstein are doing the kind of investigation they did to report Watergate. We have Iraq-gate and Oil-gate and Halliburton-gate and on and on.

3. The many, many voting irregularities in the 2004 election would have been Page 1 news and the lead story on the evening news every day and night. Reporters would have done in-depth investigations. The detailed report on this subject presented by some in Congress would have received widespread press.

4. Monica-gate would never have happened. That's right, if this were truly a "Liberal Media" the story would have never come to light.

"Liberal Media" is a myth.

Wednesday, May 25, 2005



Visit ThisIsMyStore.com for all your shopping and travel needs.
Shop ThisIsMyIpodStore.com for all your Ipod and mp3 related needs.


The Nuclear Compromise

The Nuclear Compromise

May 25, 2005

By Richard Kuper

The Op Ed Page

http://theopedpage.blogspot.com

Much has been written in the last day or so about the Senate compromise on the Republican threat of the Nuclear Option to end the Filibuster option in the Senate. Most of the pundits seem to believe that the Republicans were the bigger losers on this issue. I disagree. Just look at the fact that Judge Owens was approved today, about as extreme as they get, and Bolton will likely now be approved to represent the US at the UN. The Republicans are already saying that when the Democrats try to use the Filibuster, which they agreed to use only under "extreme" circumstances, they will impose their nuclear option. Since it will be hard for the Democrats to say that anyone is more extreme than Owens, it is this writers' opinion that it is the Democrats who lost big-time with the compromise.

Of course the biggest losers are the citizens of the United States.